On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Gergo Tisza <gtisza(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Trying to make our content less free for fear that
someone might misuse it
is a shamefully wrong frame
of mind for and organization that's supposed to be a leader of the
open content movement, IMO.
Do you think there is something "shameful" about Wikipedia using the
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License?
And if that isn't shameful, why would it be shameful if Wikidata used the
Attribution has a dual benefit:
1. It provides visibility for Wikimedia and the open content movement.
2. The public can see where the data comes from.
What is shameful about that?