On 5/2/06, Anthony DiPierro wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
What about a corporate logo released under the ND license, and only the ND license? What about a cartoon character released under the ND license, and only the ND licence? What about a movie poster, or a magazine cover, or a painting, or a clip from a DVD? Pretty much any image under the ND license, when you are talking about that image itself, and not the thing depicted by the image.
Anyway, we should be talking about principles here, not specific examples. The ND license itself isn't even the point, as it's only an example.
Show me a case where we can get an ND license, but the prospect of getting a free license are zero, show me cases where accepting an ND license wouldn't hurt our ability to obtain a free license.
Until then you're just blowing smoke.