Greg is telling "foundation" people that
they need to
be transparent with "wiki" people no matter how
expensive because "wiki" is the means of the
"foundation". Erik replies that his first method of
promoting transparency to these people is to promote
more of them to volunteer in these issues rather than
just comment. Meanwhile, in the ru.WB thread, a
"wiki" person explains why he finds "foundation"
people to be pesky salesman that would do better to
spend their time on wiki work.
I wouldn't read too much into the ravings of a rogue admin - I don't
think his views are particularly representative of any significant
portion of the community.