Greetings,
I have read the recent additional questions or answers (Special:Diff/134537). I have a stronger feeling now that most probably we are talking about specific aspects and areas of the right. It might be similar to someone stating that they visited India. Once asked what they visited, they responded that they visited the Taj Mahal. That's fine but that's a monument of the country, undoubtedly very famous. However that's not the only thing, there are many many other places to look out for.
The subject of human rights is very very important, and I believe, most definitely, this is an area we should be careful about everywhere (not only Wikimedia). I am yet to understand what we are trying to do here, and more importantly how? Possibly we are using the terms very lightly here.
My questions:
a) Is this an attempt to safeguard Wikimedians' human rights (if so, b) which are the rights? and c) how exactly and not vaguely?) [I do understand this will be very challenging, but that's something, even if we attempt, would be super amazing.]
d) Who is going to work on the implementation? e) how?
Mostly I would not be able to attend the call. I'll be happy to continue the discussion here on the mailing list or preferably on my talk page (or any on-Wiki talk page).
Sincere thanks for your kind attention,
PS: I think this can be very well-presented by changing the perspective, specially from an end-user's (Wikimedian's perspective) and a set of hypothetical questions sorted by order. This might be helpful and make things easier to understand. I can spend some time and prepare this on-wiki if you think that helps. Kindly let me know.