On 30/12/2007, Andrew Whitworth <wknight8111(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I guess I'm not understanding the difference you
are using here. The
bot is translating text from one wikipedia for use in another
wikipedia, so are you saying that wikipedia content itself is "spam"?
Or are you asserting (as I assume you are) that this user was trying
to artificially increase the vo.wikipedia article count to try and
lend undue credence to the Volapuk language?
That is precisely what he said he was doing.
A simple assumption of good faith here should prevent
us from assuming
that any of these actions are nefarious, especially if they are
producing acceptable articles. Assuming good faith would also breed
tolerance, because we would assume that the articles were being
created in furtherance of our goals, not as some sort of underhanded
marketing scheme for a dead conlang.
Except that he said that was what he was doing. I'm not going to
"assume good faith" in the face of a direct statement from the person
about what they're doing.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Vo…
- d.