On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, geni wrote:
On 2/7/07, Samuel Klein <meta.sj(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
This is cute.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:NotSuckBanner.jpg
It strikes me that images such as this one, which use project logos (not
the Foundation logo) should
a) be available under a specific license describing how they can be
reused without permission
b) be fairly unrestricted for community use, allowing derivations
Sounds extreamly messy. Define community.
Certainly any project taking place on Wikipedia wikis counts.
There has been
work in other communities regarding distinguishing between
"official" and open-use community logos. For instance, you can see
Debian's dual logos here:
http://www.debian.org/logos/ [1]
--SJ
From what I understand the result of that is that most people use the
free one for pretty much everything.
That sounds a bit like the history of Wikipedia itself.
SJ