Is it time to close the advisory board wiki like we just closed
quality.wikimedia.org? Considering the state you describe, I rather
think so (even qualitywiki wasn't so bad). Content could be moved to
foundationwiki or Meta (or both) depending on what it is.
-Mike
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 17:08 +1000, Angela wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Samuel Klein
<meta.sj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
A related question - I see there was a request to set up a new domain, "
strategy.wikimedia.org"
What would this new site be for? New single-purpose wikis can flounder
after distracting people with setting up basic infrastructure (userpages,
handy community gathering points) and tend to segment the community in a way
that discourages broad participation.
That's a good point. It reminded me of the advisory board wiki, which
I just checked and found full of junk and spam with no useful edits in
a long time. Any activity there was drowned out by the creation of
accounts, user pages, templates (not sure it needed AfD...), and
off-topic pages. I've moved the content to meta and I'm guessing that
the strategy content would be better off there as well.
Angela