On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 11:33:17 -0600, Kiss All <kissall(a)gmail.com> wrote:
However, you got the point: we need a practical
license for this type
of intellectual property. Mostly it contradicts the current patent
laws. Just like free software contradicts copyright. We need a
"Stallman" in this area too,.
Oh please not another [[rms]]; couldnt we ask for another [[lessig]] instead?
--
hit me: robin.shannon.id.au
jab me: saudade(a)jabber.zim.net.au
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons
Recombo Plus License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sampling+/1.0/