I am going to be quite frank and say that it is pointless to have this
discussion on this list. Only a fraction of the english wikipedia community
are on it. If you are genuinely serious about this then propose it on the
english wikipedia. This is not a foundation level issue nor will it ever
become one so put it to the community.
Seddon
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Amir E. Aharoni <
amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
2011/1/16 Yaroslav M. Blanter
<putevod(a)mccme.ru>ru>:
Nope, it doesn't have to be this way. There
should be no "full admins"
and "partial admins"; there should be no "admins" at all. There
should
be people who protect pages and people who block vandals. Some people
may have both permissions.
The suggestion sounds reasonable to me, but I do not see any way it could
be implemented.
You think that the community will object? I understand where that
feeling comes from, but if the community really wants to have
"administrators" that have both privileges, it may continue with the
current deal by granting both of them to whoever passes "RFA".
In fact it's quite likely that communities will want to give as little
permissions as possible to users.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l