On 6/5/06, Jimmy Wales jwales@wikia.com wrote:
The composition of the board is of critical importance to insuring that our core mission and community values are respected.
Of course. But "if someone isn't active anymore, they shouldn't be on the Board" seems pretty much like a no-brainer to me. And there seems very little risk in accepting one or two more members from the community on the Board. After all, this is how we ended up with Angela and Anthere. It would be nice to hear some of the more concrete concerns and arguments why we do not speed up this process a little bit.
It would be absolutely fine to start a public dialogue about it right now. Who do you recommend we approach?
Well, as Delirium said, we should try to figure out why we need someone like this on the Board in the first place, and what the exact roles and responsibilities would be. If our goal is outreach and fundraising, then it might actually be advisable to not put these individuals on the regular Board, but on a special Advisory Board, where their role is to give input on specific questions we send to them, and where we retain the final authority.
Such an approach has the advantage that we could pick a much larger number of outside people to serve us, without diminishing the executive power of the core individuals who actually run the organization. Here I would recommend people like Lessig, Stallman, Negroponte, and/or people from the European free culture / free software community who have good name recognition. I would have reservations about all these individuals being asked to participate in votes on resolutions and such, because of availability and strong opinions that may clash with our culture.
If our goal is to have someone who actually participates in executive decisions and provides fresh thinking that we may not find within our community, then I think we should look more closely in non-profits associated with ICT in the developing world, given our stated mission. One person who immediately comes to mind is Achal Prabhala, an important, charismatic and brilliant international leader in the "Access to Knowledge" movement, i.e. availability of free textbooks and other learning resources, international IP law, etc. (he gave an excellent speech at Wikimania on the topic). Someone associated with Geekcorps (I only know Kaspar Souren) or the Shuttleworth Foundation would also make sense, I think. Sj could probably drop a few other important names in that area quickly.
So, let's first figure out which direction we want to take, and then narrow down the list of names.
Erik