I apology. I'll use the proper terminology in the future.
The confusion mostly came from the fact I had absolutely not understood
that chapters at the national level, or chapter at any other level would
have exactly the same rights and roles than the currently existing chapters.
I did not mean to belittle the recently created chapter.
Please also note that I never questionned the necessity for USA to need
or not need something, but originally thought these chapters would not
have the same rights and as such wanted to be able to identify them by
those rights.
As long as it is actually the same, I have no further comments or questions.
Ant
Dan Rosenthal wrote:
Florence and Gerard,
Could you perhaps not insist on using the non-existent term "sub-chapters"?
If we're going to rehash the ages old discussion on US chapters and "what
does a chapter do" and "Why does the US need this" and other such dead
horses, it'd be nice if we all used the proper terminology. Thanks.
-Dan
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Cary Bass <cary(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Florence Devouard wrote:
Michael Snow wrote:
Florence Devouard wrote:
> For example, on meta, Wikimedia NYC is listed as chapters, not
> subchapters.
>
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_New_York_City. And the
> name does not clarify the difference either (it could have been
> mandatory that names used be of the type Wikimedia + Country +
> blabla).
>
It is a chapter.
...
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Approval_of_Wikimedia_New_Yo…
So... the resolution stating that "The Board of Trustees officially
recognizes Wikimedia NYC as a Sub-National Chapter " should
actually be read as "The Board of Trustees officially recognizes
Wikimedia NYC as a Chapter "
?
Jeeee....
I fail to see the distinction. A sub-national chapter and a national
chapter are both still full chapters; as opposed to something which
would be considered a sub-chapter--which would be completely
different. I don't see how the Board has to rephrase anything.
Cary
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJdg2/yQg4JSymDYkRAlxGAKCQLW6F4DF3Bauer217fExL8y+mrgCgriCo
THpeVBxX/ZUhlIfaAZYjX/c=
=9WQb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l