Heh, I probably shouldn't have chosen a word with two more or less
contradictory ideas that also refers to a mediawiki userright. I meant
oversight as in scrutiny by other Wikimedians to ensure the process doesn't
go off the rails, not oversight as in negligence or oversight as in what we
do to especially nasty content instead of revdel. (I would consider any
process that gets large graphics on to prominent pages on the projects with
so few checks on it as lacking sufficient oversight.)
-----
Kevin Gorman
Wikipedian-in-Residence
UC Berkeley
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Pete Forsyth <peteforsyth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Kevin Gorman
<kgorman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
there's something seriously weird about the
fact that a project that all
other projects depend on has the media it displays on it's front page
selected by pretty much one person with no
I was with you up until the last word. Did you really mean:
oversight.
???
-Pete
[[User:Peteforsyth]]
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>