@Pedro :Yep, it's a two way interaction that I believe benefits all projects
(sort of human interwiki)
@Thomas:Echo would be the English word, thanks. "Ecco" however is also
correct eEnglish, ref.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Guerilla_non-eEnglish_spelling_and_grammar_c….
(Note to self: Irony should be avvoided in online communication, especially
when writing foreignly)
@Gerard: Yes, there will be a lot of loud voices, but in the end we'll
manage to work out this as an improvement to help new (and perhaps older)
users as well. There was A LOT of load voices at Commons when (what I still
hope is) a more userfriendly uploadsystem was launched, but it seems to be
working just fine ;)
We may get more nonsense articles going straight to speedy deletion, but the
way to raise the quality of wikip/media is certainly not to avvoid maiking
it easier for people to edit,
Finn R
2008/12/1 Pedro Sanchez <pdsanchez(a)gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Finn Rindahl
<finnrindwiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I'd like to ecco (is that an eEnglish
word..?) Michael Finney here. Most
people who engage them self in a small language wikimedia projects will
sooner or later participate in projects like en:wp and commons as well -
and
thus both learn more about the "facts of
reality" as well as
communicating
with others in a (for them) foreign language.
An also a fair share of people who initially engage into enwip ant he
alike, eventually decide to migrate to smaller projects.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l