On 30 January 2016 at 13:14, Tobias <church.of.emacs.ml(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Almost one third (!) of the respondents were
themselves the subject of
revenge porn, defined by the survey as: "publishing of sexually explicit
or sexualised photos of without one's consent".
Wait, what? How could that possibly be...?
Either a substantial number of respondents did not answer truthfully, or
they didn't understand the question, or I really have no clue what's
going on in this community.
Possibly an artefact of a self-selecting audience.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk