on 12/28/07 12:55 PM, Derrick Farnell at derrick.farnell@gmail.com wrote:
there are some requirements by the management to have persons who can help them to have historical knowledge about the projets and to have an in depth knowledge of the communities.
The community can also provide such knowledge.
The advantage of the board is that *the board change* with addition of
new persons who can bring *new* visions and *new* relations and *new* experience.
The community can also provide all of that.
Personally I disagree any action of the management towards communities
*without* board's consultation: it could be a suicide.
I wasn't suggesting that management should make decisions without consultation - indeed, I was suggesting that they there should be more, not less, consultation, by consulting not just the board, but also the community as a whole.
Derrick Farnell
Derrick,
What mechanisms do we have in place where we could consult with the whole Community?
Marc Riddell
On Dec 28, 2007 12:49 PM, Ilario Valdelli valdelli@gmail.com wrote:
Personally I disagree with this vision (There is a board because legally an association requires to have a board), because there are some requirements by the management to have persons who can help them to have historical knowledge about the projets and to have an in depth knowledge of the communities. The management itself declare that.
IMHO the board *has got* this knowledge (and not a single person in the board) because the board is heterogeneous, come from the communities and all members seems to be (or to have been) wikipedians.
Without the board the management could take wrong ways.
The advantage of the board is that *the board change* with addition of new persons who can bring *new* visions and *new* relations and *new* experience.
Personally I disagree any action of the management towards communities *without* board's consultation: it could be a suicide.
Ilario
On Dec 28, 2007 12:44 PM, Derrick Farnell derrick.farnell@gmail.com wrote:
Found the below interesting little piece about the Foundation on the web
(
http://www.timshell.com/wikipedia/whyboard.html). I think it would help matters here if the current board stated whether it is still true today.
As
I stated earlier in this thread, I'm not just concerned about the demise
of
'radical transparency', but also about the fact that the decision to
kill it
off was apparently made without consultation with the community.
Derrick Farnell
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l