Thomas Dalton wrote:
I guess it all depends on exactly what is meant by
"disparaging". I
expect the actual agreement was rather more precise than the title.
The difference between disparagement and legitimate criticism would need
to be defined, yes, and Mike will be working on a formula to try and
provide a little more clarity. In the meantime, with or without a
non-disparagement agreement, board members still have a fiduciary
obligation to always act in the best interests of the organization.
--Michael Snow