On 28/03/2008, Adam Brookes <adambro(a)aebrookes.co.uk> wrote:
I very much doubt that the Foundation would be happy
with having the WMF
logo used in any way which may suggest that Commons photographers are in
anyway represent the Foundation. The Foundation have been cautious about the
Wikinews accreditation process for this very same reason. They want to
minimise the risk of exposing the WMF to legal repercussions.
Yeah. The problem is not making up a badge, it's all the legal issues
and project politics surrounding "accreditation".
Is there a nice page somewhere summarising how Wikinews editions deal
with accrediting reporters, which might serve as a comparison?