On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen466(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Gnangarra
5.People need to able to trust all data in
WikiData, otherwise they just
wont use it because as Wikidata expands the same PR firms, interest
which have seen so many of WP issues will
gravitate to the easier to
I think the potential problem here is far worse: people *will use* the
data, because their lack of trustworthiness, as amply described in the
Wikidata disclaimer, is no longer visible when they're displayed as
"fact" by dominant search engines.
It's worth mentioning:
Dominant search engines do not rely on one source of information to surface
results, they get information from many sources, weigh the responses they
get based on the trust on the sources and many other factors, and aggregate
to find the best answer to be shown to the user.
I just used "chicken pox" as a search query in Google, I see an information
box on the right-hand-side of the page about the disease, and when I click
on Sources I get this page
("See where we found the medical information") which shows all the sources
Google has used to retrieve information about chicken pox from, nothing in
that list starts with wiki. Of course, this is not the case for all search
queries, for some of them, Google still uses Wikipedia snippets.