On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:58 PM, stevertigo<stvrtg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Geoffrey
Plourde<geo.plrd(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Well, if the list is for general dispute
resolution technique, it could be valuable to all projects.
Its a very simple idea, and one which sort of fills a role that
wikien-l played for years, and for which there are several disjointed
on-wiki portals for doing certain things. For a long time I myself
stated that handling things on-list was inferior to doing things
on-wiki, and thus I agree with this proposals critics to some degree.
But in fact on-wiki dispute resolution is scattered, disjointed, and
in need of upgrades that integrate its disjointed and constituent
components into a better working machine.
The only thing controversial about it is that I am the one proposing
it, and I don't really even understand why that in and of itself
should be particularly problematic, if people can simply deal with the
concept without basing their objection in privately made criticisms
and characterizations.
-Steven
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
I don't care who's proposing it, to be honest. My issue is that
this thread does not belong on foundation-l, which others seem
to agree since I first said so some 14 posts ago. Take it back
to wikien-l, /please/.
-Chad