I echo SJ's words. This is ad hominem, especially against someone who has been a part of the Wikimedia community much before being a part of WMF, continues to remain a part of her home community in volunteer capacity, and has expanded her volunteerism to contribute to global roles. That, IMO, is a full-time contribution to the Wikimedia movement in both personal and professional capacity. It's shameful that the title of this email includes Manavpreet's name and goes into with character assassination. Won't it be better to frame, if you doubt the process, the process as faulty and cite reasons rather than attacking an individual Wikimedian? It would be useful to fix a faulty process rather than attacking an individual based on circumstances which might dissuade them? Not to mention, this movement is already struggling with low participation of women, LGBTQ+ individuals, people with disabilities and indigenous members/groups. Such a behaviour would only help grow that gap further.