Congratulations to the 4 winners.
I saw that the STV system unveiled how the 4th and 5th positions (appears
to be from a G7 country and a non G7 country) had switched. I am interested
to know from which sector/s or Wikimedia project brought the switch of
those two positions (starting from the 8th iteration).
I also observed that I have no option to choose which wiki I will
represent. It appears that the system only allows which wiki I first
clicked the central notice link. I tried to go to the other projects and
vote, it allowed me to change my vote (still one eligible ballot) but it
did not change the project I will represent. I am saying this because it
would allow people reading the statistics which project the eligible voter
truly represents.
Despite all the consultations made prior to the elections to bring the
emerging communities/ global south to the board it had not accurately
painted the picture. I would personally suggest in the future not all
candidates vie for the same set of seats. So for instance, there are 4
seats up for grabs, two seats must be reserved for sector A and two seats
for sector B. Candidates must select which sector they represent and cannot
be both. Then the whole electorate votes for candidates for Sector A board
seats and Sector B board seats using the same STV system. Qualifications
for Sector A and Sector B seats shall be different and will be decided by
the board of trustees with consent from an advisory/ electoral committee. I
personally suggest developed communities (from big chapters and wiki
projects with large edit participation) and emerging communities (small to
medium sized affiliates and wiki projects with medium to small edit
participation).
Kind Regards,
Butch
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 5:52 AM Alice Wiegand <me.lyzzy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, Jackie!
That is indeed different from what I understood and I’m glad about the
change :-)
Alice.
Am 07.09.2021 um 23:42 schrieb Jackie Koerner <
jkoerner-ctr(a)wikimedia.org>gt;:
Hi Alice,
Thanks for asking! The way we are intending "contended" is that it was
the election everyone was waiting for. :) It was "pushed for" by the
community for more than a year and now we gladly announce: it happened and
here are the results!
Best,
Jackie
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 4:29 PM Alice Wiegand <me.lyzzy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
congrats to the elected Board members. It’s great to see people
stepping up and taking responsibility, especially in times where leadership
is needed.
Jackie, may I ask for some elaboration on the subject of this thread?
You say „most contended … election“ and I wonder what that means. In my
understanding this is a nuance of controversial and I don’t get the point
where it is more controversial than any other election. Maybe it gets lost
in translation, maybe it’s me not having the complete insight of what has
been discussed.
Alice.
Am 07.09.2021 um 20:10 schrieb Jackie Koerner <
jkoerner-ctr(a)wikimedia.org>gt;:
*Translations can be found on
Meta:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedi
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedi>a_Foundation_elections/2021/2021-09-07/2021_Election_Results
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2021/2021-09-07/2021_Election_Results>*
Thank you to everyone who participated in the 2021 Board election. The
Elections Committee has reviewed the votes of the 2021 Wikimedia Foundation
Board of Trustees election, organized to select four new trustees. A record
6,873 people from across 214 projects cast their valid votes. The following
four candidates received the most support:
1. Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight
2. Victoria Doronina
3. Dariusz Jemielniak
4. Lorenzo Losa
Waiting for the Board’s appointment
While these candidates have been ranked through the community vote,
they are not yet appointed to the Board of Trustees. They still need to
pass a successful background check and meet the qualifications outlined in
the Bylaws. This process can be longer depending on the country of
residence of the candidates. The Board has set a tentative date to appoint
new trustees at the end of this month. The Board also has approved
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/thread/37IV7FRWIKM4YAK2WBTUTPJA7LKGOATI/#37IV7FRWIKM4YAK2WBTUTPJA7LKGOATI>
a short extension to the terms of the exiting trustees to allow a smooth
transition.
Thanks to all the candidates
Thanks to all candidates for their participation. They achieved a
record in the number of candidates and regional diversity, with more than
half of the 19 candidates from regions outside North America and Western
Europe. This election used Single Transferable Voting
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/Single_Transferable_Vote>
for the first time. This system does not indicate a number of votes or
percentage of support. Rather, it shows in which round each candidate was
eliminated. You can review the full results on Meta-Wiki
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2021/Results>,
which document the order in which the candidates were mathematically
eliminated.
Thanks to all the election volunteers
The Board of Trustees stressed
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/2021-04-15_Resolution_about_the_upcoming_Board_elections>
the importance of increasing diversity on the Board. Dozens of volunteers
supported by a team of multilingual facilitators promoted the election in
up to 61 languages. They hosted many conversations about the Board election
in more than 50 languages and encouraged community members to participate
in all areas of the election.
Statistics
The 2021 Board of Trustees election broke new ground in several areas.
The Movement Strategy and Governance team will publish a report with the
most remarkable metrics soon. In the meantime, some statistics
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2021/Stats>
can be found on Meta-Wiki. Here you have some highlights.
- Participation increased by 1,753 voters over 2017. Overall
turnout was 10.13%, 1.1 percentage points more than in 2017.
- The highest participation among wikis with at least 5 eligible
voters was seen on the Hausa and Igbo Wikipedias. Both wikis had a
participation of 75% (6 of 8 eligible voters). Other high participation
numbers were seen on the Telugu, Nepalese, and Punjabi Wikipedias.
- The largest increase in participation among wikis with at least
50 eligible voters was the Catalan Wikipedia, on which 36.3% of eligible
voters voted (28 percentage points higher than in 2017).
- There were 214 wikis represented in the election. This is
determined by the wiki on which the account was originally created.
- A total of 74 wikis that did not participate in 2017 produced
voters in this election.
- A total of 226 wikis had at least one eligible voter but produced
no voters. The largest electorate in this group was Cantonese Wikipedia,
with 25 eligible voters.
In the upcoming days, an anonymized list of votes will be released that
will allow deeper inspection and publication of more metrics.
2022 election
The next Board of Trustees election is planned to take place in 2022.
Interested community members can watch the Wikimedia Foundation
elections page for updates
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections>. Four
community seats will be selected at that time. It is not too early to
consider and prepare for candidacy. Community members may like to check out Candidate
Resources
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/Candidate_Resources>
to learn more about what to expect and how to prepare for this role.
--
*Jackie Koerner*
*she/her*
Facilitator, Movement Strategy and Governance
*English language communities and Meta-Wiki*
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
--
*Jackie Koerner*
*she/her*
Facilitator, Movement Strategy and Governance
*English language communities and Meta-Wiki*
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
--
Sincerely,
Roman Bustria Jr.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is privileged and intended only
for the recipients named. If the reader is not a representative of the
intended recipient, any review, dissemination or copying of this message or
the information it contains is prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, please immediately notify the sender, and delete the
original message and attachments.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at: