Gerard Meijssen<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
What do you not understand ?
That is not
for you to say.
It has been explained to you that the en approach
is not compatible with what happens elsewhere.
What does this even mean? Nothing
has been "explained." Terse and
useless "go away's" do not suffice as explanations.
This list is explicitly NOT about the en
policies.
Dispute resolution is not particular to en.wiki. Others can benefit
from en.wiki's "policies" and likewise en.wiki can benefit from
understanding how others handle their issues.
You have been politely asked to go away..
This is actually a contradiction of terms, though you state the
concept quite nicely.
Now what does it take for you to move on with
this nonsense ?
Are you speaking in an official capacity?
-Steven
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
I'm speaking as a volunteer: go away, and take your thread with you.
It is /not/ appropriate for foundation-l, period.
It is obvious to everyone that this thread exists for solely one reason:
for you to bitch and moan when you didn't get what you wanted on
your timetable. This is also not appropriate for foundation-l, period.
-Chad