David, I strongly object to your continued twisting of my words, and your
personal crusade to turn the English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee into
a
"personal attacks" police force. That was never the intended scope of
the
committee, and it remains outside of its scope. We're currently working
through a desysop process in which one of the elements in evidence is the
administrator's alleged incivility: I'm not seeing a huge groundswell of
support from you or any other former arbitrators for the Arbitration
Committee having tackled this issue, and I don't see any historical
evidence
of committees prior to 2009 having addressed this issue either, including
the time that you were on the committee.
Risker/Anne
I'm not following current cases. I hope you all are doing good work.
However, we did address both incivility and personal attacks regularly.
Much of the Connally and Giano fuss had its origin in proposals for brief
blocks related to personal attacks.
Nothing to do with breaking Wikipedia into sections though, other than
possible license for stricter or looser policies in separate departments.
Fred
Fred
Fred