Daniel Mayer wrote:
For the record, I very strongly support this. This
is due to the fact that almost all, not just
most, new pages created by anons on the English Wikipedia are borderline to complete
crap.
That is simply incorrect. I do (or did, until this policy change)
new-pages patrol on a regular basis, and I'd estimate no more than ~30%
of new pages created by anons are "complete crap". Certainly no more
than 10-20% ever warranted speedy deletion.
Your crap tolerance must be higher than mine. :) You also misquoted me; I included a
range
modifier.
-- mav
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.