I proposed a project, WikiPragmatica
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipragmatica>, that can support fake
news detection. The retained context of the paraphrase graph can identify
fake news patterns similar to what MIT does with their detector.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 12:42 PM Galder Gonzalez Larrañaga <
galder158(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Does Wikinews cover this aspect?
------------------------------
*From:* Wikimedia-l <wikimedia-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf
of Chris Gates via Wikimedia-l <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
*Sent:* Thursday, February 4, 2021 8:20 PM
*To:* Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
*Cc:* Chris Gates <vermont(a)vtwp.org>
*Subject:* Re: [Wikimedia-l] Idea of a new project: Wikifacts ?
Hello,
Independent of my opinions on the validity of such a new Wikimedia
project, there is currently an experiment of similar goals (and potentially
structure) over at Twitter:
https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/product/2021/introducing-birdwatch-a-…
Best,
Verm
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 2:17 PM Leinonen Teemu <teemu.leinonen(a)aalto.fi>
wrote:
Hi all,
Has there been any discussion to start a new Wikimedia project focusing
on fact checking?
Fact checking of course is in the core of editing Wikipedia, but I was
thinking about dedicated wiki-site that is dedicated for fact checking of
current events and news. Why this would be important?
(1) There are many fact checking site in the English speaking world but
much less elsewhere. I am afraid that there is still greater need for fact
checking in the rest of the world. {{Citation needed}}
(2) Our community is very well educated to do fact checking the wiki-way.
Again internationally, many of our community members are real fact
champions in their home countries and language groups. The practice of
Wikipedia could be applied to fact checking of fast moving current events
and news, too.
(3) This could help us to get new young people to the movement, as
editing Wikipedias is not anymore so easy to start (because they are so
good already).
(4) In many parts of the world, fact checking can also be dangerous. With
our anonymous and community driven practices and services we could protect
the fact checkers in many parts of the world.
I am not sure what is the state of the Wikinews, but my impression is
that it is not really working. It was a good idea, but maybe wiki or
wiki-way is not the way to produce news. Also the beautiful idea of citizen
journalism has not really become reality. Maybe we could try if wiki and
the wki-way works better in fact checking.
Peace,
- Teemu
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: