Hi, Lodewijc!
2013/6/1 Lodewijk <lodewijk(a)effeietsanders.org>rg>:
[...]
Basically my questions are:
* Did the board formally consider the complaints filed through this process
or does that process stop at the ombudsperson?
Yes, in fact the Board
representatives at the FDC posted a formal
answer after receiving the ombudsperson report [1].
* If yes, what was the decision on that and why was it
not communicated in
the resolution?
As you can find in our answer, we decided to support the FDC
recommendation. There's a full explanation there about why we decided
that way.
* Are links to the complaints intentionally made
scarce on meta or is this
an oversight for example because this is the first time such complaints
have been filed?
As with the previous question, I think you are making this one
because
you missed our formal answer to the complaint, which, by the way, was
inmediately communicated to the Chapter's representatives. But anyway,
if you have any idea that could improve the whole process, we will be
happy to consider it.
Thank you,
Patricio
[1]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Complaints_regarding_FDC_recommen…
--
Patricio Lorente
Blog:
http://www.patriciolorente.com.ar
Identi.ca // Twitter: @patriciolorente