To bring some sort of closure to this thread about Wikimedia salary costs,
Wikimedia CEO Maryana Iskander did eventually post a response on Meta.
My question and her reply are copied in full below.
What please was the 2019 salary cost per WMF employee, per the most recent
Wikimedia Foundation Form 990
According to the linked Form 990, the WMF had salary costs of $55,634,913
(page 1, line 15, "Salaries, other compensation, employee benefits") in
2019, and a total of 291 employees (page 1, line 5). On the face of it,
this makes for an average salary cost of over $191K per employee.
Is this the correct figure, or if not, what is the correct calculation for
the average salary cost per employee in 2019? Are there estimates for more
recent years? Thanks, --Andreas
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jayen466> 01:04, 17
February 2022 (UTC)[reply
Hi Andreas - I am six weeks into the job and have seen your questions about
salaries at the Wikimedia Foundation in various public forums. I would like
to try and give you a response. What interests me most is understanding the
motivations for your questions so that I can attempt to share appropriate
information. You are welcome to contact me directly at miskander[image:
for a conversation as I won’t respond further here.What
I can share is the following:Calculating an average salary based on the
Form 990 is highly misleading. It produces totals that match our
highest-paid employees, as you see on the 990 form. This is true of many
organisations, not only the Wikimedia Foundation. As we will not release
non-public salary information in public forums, we accept that this number
is much higher than the true average salary. We currently have over 500
staff all over the world that are in a wide variety of job types and
levels, each of which are paid differently and by location. An average is
difficult to calculate and while it may provide a data point, it lacks
meaning for evaluating our performance as an organisation. An average
salary cost, even based on non-public data, is not useful for most of the
issues that concern me most. We hire in over 50 countries, which is a
reflection of our values as a global movement, but introduces complexity in
ensuring we can offer competitive packages that will attract mission-driven
talent, and especially engineers who we need to support the technology
obligations of the Foundation. People are the biggest investment we make in
supporting the Wikimedia projects and community, so this is a topic of
critical importance to me. Finally, I have also checked that we are in line
with other open knowledge organisations (e.g., Mozilla, Creative Commons,
EFF) in the financial, salary, budget, and staff information that we
publish. MIskander-WMF <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:MIskander-WMF>
(talk <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MIskander-WMF>) 14:54, 17
February 2022 (UTC)[reply
I'll just leave some general comments on Maryana's response here.
1. An organisation committed to transparency shouldn't give a friendly or
beholden inquirer any different information than a hostile one in response
to questions of fact. In both cases, the information should simply be
accurate. I have no desire to ingratiate myself.
2. As for my motivation, it's surely one that any Wikipedian can relate to:
I would like the public to have access to accurate information. I sometimes
write about these topics and assist journalists with related research.
3. I don't accept that calculating an average for 291 employees produces a
figure that matches "our highest-paid employees". On the contrary, it
produces a figure for ALL "employees" in the strict sense of the word
(excluding freelancers). Even factoring in freelancers, the 291 employees
listed on the Form 990 were by far the majority of the total number of
people working for the WMF in 2019, and not some sort of elite.
4. I did not ask for the release of non-public information. I simply wanted
to know how many people's pay, approximately, the front-page figure of
$55.6 million represents. I thought it was 291, based on the "Total number
of individuals employed in calendar year 2019" given in the Form 990.
Anne/Risker asserted the $55.6 million figure also included the pay of the
82 contractors listed in Part V, line 1a. Which is it? Are some or all of
those contractors included in the salary costs total? The WMF won't say.
5. Salary costs are the WMF's biggest expenditure item. They reached $69M
in 2020/21 – a tenfold increase in the course of a decade. Throughout that
period of staff and salary growth, the Wikimedia Foundation regularly and
purposely created an impression in the public's mind that it was struggling
to have enough money to keep Wikipedia up and running – donations were
solicited by telling the public that money was urgently needed to keep
Wikipedia "ad-free", "keep Wikipedia online", "protect
independence", etc. Money used to fund organisational growth should not be
collected under the pretence of financial emergencies jeopardising the
continuation of basic services; members of the public should know what they
6. Another Indian fundraiser is due to start in a few weeks' time. Former
WMF CEO Katherine Maher acknowledged to me that there were problems with
the messaging in the last Indian fundraiser, resulting in press stories
that were "misleading and alarmist". I hope that the WMF will do its best
this year to ensure that the Indian press is accurately informed about
Wikimedia's financial past and present situation, including the Wikimedia
Endowment, and that fundraising messages, emails and statements given to
the press will not continue to imply that Wikipedia's "independence",
online "accessibility" or "survival" will be endangered unless the
public donates money.
7. While I'm on this topic, the Wikimedia Endowment, now well on its way to
the $200M mark, is completely non-transparent. It has no public records and
no audited accounts; people have no way of knowing how the money is
invested, what if anything it is spent on, how much Tides and other
consultants and contractors are paid for holding and administering the
fund, and so on. In my view, both the community and the public are owed a
little more transparency than that.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 2:10 PM Andreas Kolbe <jayen466(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Dear WMF accounts staff,
Could you kindly clarify whether the "Salaries, other compensation,
employee benefits" figure in Part I, line 15 of the Form 990 relates solely
to the 291 employees indicated in Part I, line 5, or whether it also
includes salaries, compensation and benefits for the 82 contractors listed
in Part V, line 1a of the Form 990.