Christiaan Briggs (christiaan(a)last-straw.net) [050225 01:08]:
This is getting out of hand, now GerardM is resorting
to vandalism:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=End-
user_image_suppression&curid=15602&diff=0&oldid=0
That's not even close to vandalism by any reasonable definition. Wht it has
done is concisely outline the actual situation that you appear not to wish
to acknowledge in any way at all.
What Gerard actually did with the above edit was take this paragraph:
This page originated from a discussion on the WikiEN-I mailing list where
some level of consensus was reached between the free-speech and content
suppression parties that a technical solution is possible that will go a
long way towards satisfying most mainstream positions in the debate.
- and add the following text:
However, it should be stressed that this page is ''not'' intended to
imply
that this is a <i>fait accompli</i>, but merely an initial exploration of
the specification and feasibility of a possible solution. The features
described below are ''not'' currently under development, and will
certainly
not be made live until their desirability has been firmly established.
Are you saying that this is false, and making out that saying this is
"vandalism"?
- d.