Hoi,
When we have consensus on that one, someone has to count them.. So what
piority do we give it and, what do we bumb down the list ? Alternatively who
is volunteering to write the necessary software anyway and how are we going
to get it operational ??
PS I like the idea <grin>
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/7/31 Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Ryan
Lomonaco<wiki.ral315(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
The rules did disenfranchise me, for example. It
doesn't bother me that
I
can't vote, but that said, I would've
liked to vote if eligible. I am
not
active on Wikipedia, but I do follow the mailing
lists, and have followed
the election process. If I really wanted to, I could've racked up 50
edits
to get a vote, but that almost seems
"dirty", I guess, to make edits just
to
regain eligibility for the election.
I think that mailing lists posts should be treated as edits.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l