I agree with Craig on the most reasonable interpretation of the limited
commentary from the Board in recent weeks. Indeed, it would be quite
normal, even expected, to include a mutual non-disparagement clause in any
separation agreement, which by its very nature is confidential.
On 7 March 2016 at 01:50, Craig Franklin <cfranklin(a)halonetwork.net> wrote:
To be honest, I consider it unlikely that Patricio or
anyone else is going
to discuss HR matters at length in public, even when they concern Lila, and
especially when they could potentially be interpreted as negative towards a
particular identifiable individual. For legal reasons, it might be the
case that the BoT will let Lila have as dignified an exit as possible from
the organisation, without putting a whole bunch of information into the
public domain about how they regarded her performance.
On 7 March 2016 at 16:39, Oliver Keyes <ironholds(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1. I would also very much appreciate Patricio
explaining whether the
"full confidence of the board" actually meant the full confidence:
IOW, that a vote was taken and everyone unanimously agreed that Lila's
continuation was the best thing.
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org