Why did you feel it necessary to reply to Gerard? Is it so important
to you to have the last word? In your last e-mail, you said you didn't
want to continue this thread any further. The best way to put an end
to it is to stop responding to others' messages rather than to tell
others not to respond to yours.
Mark
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM, stevertigo<stvrtg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Gerard
Meijssen<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Please consider a topic that matters.
It's not important that this list be run according to certain basic
rules and principles?
And no doubt there are others here who dislike your own comments for
the simple fact that they extend the thread - even after I said I'd
leave it alone.
Navel gazing and fault finding
Navel
gazing is not the same thing as fault finding. I don't see how
there's been any of the former, or how the latter should be criticized
if it deals with an issue.
are hardly of a general interest.
Granted
it's a meta issue, and not a general Foundation policy issue.
But this is not the foundation-press-release list either, such that
all posts need to conform to some sanitized concept.
-Stevertigo
Again, I think this thread is done.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l