guys, please! Lets not try to solve hypothetical problems here until we know
what the problem will be! Let the folks see if they can get people together
in the first place, what they want to do, and what in their opinion would be
the best way to organize that. THEN we can see if a chapter has to be
approved or not.
Lodewijk
2010/9/28 jamesmikedupont(a)googlemail.com <jamesmikedupont(a)googlemail.com>
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:45 PM, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 28 September 2010 12:40, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 27
September 2010 21:02, Joan Goma <jrgoma(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> We are here to promote Wikimedia projects not
to promote Serbia union
nor
> Kosovo independence.
Very true, but allowing separate Kosovan and
Sebian chapters (which is
probably best for the WM movement, since the Serbian chapter
presumably can't operate effective runs the risk of appearing to
promote Kosovan independance. I would love it if we could stay out of
the dispute entirely, but it isn't easy to do.
Well, we already have four (or is it five?) Wikipedias for the one
language in the area. We've already dived right in.
Guys,
lets just focus on Albania, because there is no dispute there. we need an
Albanian wikimedia chapter.
mike
- d.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania
flossk.org
flossal.org
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l