Robert Scott Horning wrote:
In the case of Wikispecies, we need to keep that around
as a historical
reminder to find out just what went wrong with that proposal, and why
did the project turn out so poorly. Negative examples are just as
important as positive examples of project pages like the Wikinews or
Wikibooks pages on Meta. So are you proposing to delete the Wikinews
page as well, since the project is already up and running and no longer
needs the page on Meta? The logic is identical here other than a few
more recent edits have happened on the Wikinews page instead.
I don't think that it is fair to say that Wikispecies has turned out
poorly. I just checked the RC there and there were over 250 entries in
the last 24 hours. Is that doing poorly?
Ec