Walter van Kalken wrote:
I think that Gerard's paragraph that he added and you keep removing is highlighting the negative side of you idea. Why isn't he allowed to put that there?
As Nicholas has pointed out this page is for exploring the implementation of the idea; the opening paragraph clarifies this. There are many places where the merits of it are being and have been discussed throughout the Wikimedia community (including the talk page of this article). If we let the article become bogged down with discussion and POV about the merits of the idea then it would become an article about "whether or not it should be done", instead of "how could be done" (which is the stated purpose of the article!). But it's not simply that, Gerard has been wholly reluctant to raise specific issues instead using a slash and burn policy complete with emotional language, straw man arguments and inappropriate posting of Wikipedia NPOV tags.
Christiaan