On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As indicated earlier, the "Lebanese" request
proves that the ISO-639-3
standard is not followed blindly when giving the eligible status to a
project.
As far as I could see from previous posts, your decision is still
inside of bureaucratic behavior. They don't have the properly named
ISO code.
The language committee is restricted in what it can
share publicly.
Consequently not everything can be scrutinised by people who want to know
and see everything. As I indicated earlier, the request for Egyptian Arabic
was given extra attention.
I am interested what kinds of informations have to be confidential
when we are talking about the LangCom? Just list them and explain why.