Klaus Graf ha scritto:
There are opinions on Commons that Moeller's statement in this list ("[W]e've consistently held that faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works which are nothing more than reproductions should be considered public domain for licensing purposes") has been "overruled" by Mike Godwin's statement (which was adressed on a Wikisource case)
See http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Licensing#About_Bridgeman_vs....
We should not accept such nonsense.
Klaus Graf
Bridgeman vs. Corel only applies to reproductions made in the US of 2D works. For example, if someone takes a photograph in a State Museum in Italy, the copyright on that photograph belong to the photographer and to the museum (that's an Italian peculiarity) and by no means it can be uploaded as PD-art. Cruccone