Birgitte SB wrote:
Perhaps we would be better to post a link here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/LSS/foundation-l-archives
With a very short english message: "Last week's summary of foundation-l is now available. Please translate."
...
I don't like just posting "sensitive" messages because it is hard to tell what any one wiki will find sensitive. Not all wiki's are complaining about the sitenotice. Although the LSS is not perfect I think it is the best option for "pushing" information.
The Foundation list summary looks good.
The success of a communications strategy depends not only on the information being posted, but on people taking the time and responsibility to read it. One of the reasons for this reading failure is the sheer volume of messages that are issued. So, at least rating the significance of the messages would be important. A Board statement about a newly adopted policy would have a very high rating. Yet another person's complaint about being blocked would have a very low one. Putting numerical ratings on each message would help those with limited time to choose which ones to read first.
If the information has been there and easily accessible for a reasonable time there is no valid excuse for not being informed.
Ec