On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 16:46, Andrew Lih <andrew.lih(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Milos Rancic
<millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
And, as Andrew Lih mentioned, Wikipedia *had* payed editor at the
beginning.
Did I say this? I don't remember saying so.
I thought that it was you in some of the threads, but I missed.
In my book I described Nupedia, and how that system of
having a paid head
didn't work out (namely, Larry Sanger as editor in chief).
While I don't like Sanger, it shouldn't be forgot that he was
responsible for building the initial system on Wikipedia itself.
Wikinews, unlike Wikipedia, requires larger care; not just setting up
very initial rules.