Still, it is quite well known that manufacture funded studies come up more
often than not with entirely different results than if they are not funded
by the manufacture.
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:08 PM, John Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:02 AM, David Goodman
<dgoodmanny(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
But then it should also be said what studies were
NOT funded by the
manufacturer, and we do not know that,m because most journals do not
specify--and almost none specified in the past.
Following on from David, the funding should not matter.
We should not be using studies which have not been peer-reviewed.
We should be very wary of studies that have been peer-reviewed by
journals with a history of allowing garbage through.
We should be careful with new studies even when published in respected
journals, until the citation count rises to the point that we feel
comfortable that the study has been accepted by the academic
community.
--
John Vandenberg
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l