Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
The WMF has as its strategy to invest in what has the highest impact. Given
limited resources that makes sense. It also means that while philosophically
as volunteers we do not have to make such choices, the WMF will and does.
It is obvious that depending on your point of view, the choices made by the
WMF can be fortunate or less so. You are right that it is not in our mission
to make choices, but reality is different. The question is what choices to
make and what their likely impact is. This brings you to two competing
fundamentals; what has the most effect and what is the period to measure
those effects.
Thanks,
GerardM
You are as always, as pellucid as a brick of coal, and totally
off topic to boot. Please feel welcome to not post comments
like that again.
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen