I have to agree with Sam; I myself have been guilty of saying "the Board" or "the Foundation" when what I mean is "Jimbo." Unfortunately, it is from Jimbo that we outside the "Foundation walls" most often hear, and it is from Jimbo that most "executive orders" issue. We can't help but be confused at exactly where Jimbo's authority to bind the Foundation begins and ends. When he says "We should do this, it shall be done" (as he does from time to time), is it inappropriate to say "The Foundation says that..." For example, when page creation by anons was turned off on EN, (at least acording to Brion) it was done by order of Jimbo; are we (and the press as well) wrong in saying "The Wikimedia Foundation ordered..."
Not being privvy to the internal discussions, it becomes very hard for us to figure out where Jimbo stops and the Foundation starts, particularly because we don't know if he has discussed it with the rest of the Board (consulted with Congress?) or if he is doing it on his own authority (issuing an Executive Order?).
Perhaps we need to force him to put disclaimers on all his statements: "I'm Jimbo Wales, and I approved this message" vs. "I'm Jimbo Wales, and the Foundation approved this message." Better, however, would be to realize that as frustrating as it may be to see the two confused, it goes a lot farther to gently correct the mistake, rather than dressing down the person who made the mistake. After all, they are a person, too, and they have feelings, too. We should all try harder (our hardest, every day) to set the best example we can, whether that be to look back over what we're saying and make sure we have our terms straight, or biting our tongue when our toes have been stepped on.
Now, (as I love to say) "Everybody back to work!"
Essjay
On 1/25/06, Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/25/06, Anthere anthere9@yahoo.com wrote:
I am *sure* it was an honest mistake. This is nevertheless not the first time, not even the first time *this* week. And this is disheartening.
I think most of these "honest mistakes" are due to the fact that there are very few statements by the Board as a whole. Thus statements by individual Board members are understood as being on behalf of the Board as a whole.
Though I recognise the difficulty presented, I do think it would reduce these confusions if a definitive statement "by the Board" could be presented more often.
-- Sam _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
-- Essjay ----- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Essjay Wikipedia:The Free Encyclopedia http://www.wikipedia.org/