On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Pine W <wiki.pine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Just noting that annual plans can go through APG or
PEG, but the
qualificattions and scope are different. Some chapers choose to continue
with PEG funding becuase it is more flexible. The main limiter on PEG
funding is that it will not pay for full time permanent staff; however
according to Meta it may pay for part time or temporary staff.
APGs and PEGs for annual plans are usually recurring, but PEG funds a
variety of programs in addition to annual plans.
This is the kind of conversation that I hope Luis and his team will be
considering holistically in the next several months.
Katy of course is part of my team, so we're here, having a conversation :)
Can you elaborate a bit, Pine? You've done a good job answering MZ's
question, so I'm not clear what conversation you meant to highlight -
simply suggestions on how to improve the pages MZ linked to, or...?
Luis
--
Luis Villa
Sr. Director of Community Engagement
Wikimedia Foundation
*Working towards a world in which every single human being can freely share
in the sum of all knowledge.*