On 2/9/07, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/8/07, Delphine Ménard <notafishz(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
[snip]
If anything, I think it very sad that the biggest
Wikipedia is
condemning itself to be distributed "as such" only in countries where
the fair use doctrine exists, and bars itself from being distributed
in the rest of the world.
[snip]
I will offer you an interesting point for consideration here:
If and only if we are really good at only allowing "fair use" when no
free image is possible (i.e. only after we've tried to get the
copyright holder to make a release, only after we're sure that no
Wikipedian can create a comparable image)
Maybe I'm an eternal optimist. But frankly, in the long run, I don't
think that there is going to be ANYTHING worth mentionning in an
encyclopedia which will not provide at least one kind of media that is
free.
Because if we are true to our mission, we're going to fight to make
these things free. Images from space, images from artworks, images
from celebrities (well, for those we can already all turn into
paparazzi).
So yes, I have no doubt that one day we will be the "free encyclopedia".
And definitely, I agree that cooperation is the only way forward.
We've got time. Don't we?
Delphine
--
~notafish
NB. This address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent to
this address will probably get lost.