working to provide a support system to help nurture and develop leaders within the volunteer community is valuable. We have a lot of long term leaders and there is room to make space for new ones, but with it comes an expectation that they follow certain already embedded culture norms. If the movement is going to transition to a true global movement then we also need to address those expectations to ensure continuity while expanding the range of skills and depth of cultural knowledge.   This is something that was identified by the community during the strategy process.

I think the biggest issue is from saying 2030 over and over again as it has created a concept that we have until 2030 to do this. The reality is that these areas aren't even going to be operational by 2025 at which point someone is going to start a 2040 strategy. Half the current contributors were not even here in 2016 when this started, and over half have already left.  Any effort to develop ways to enhance a person's skill set also enhances the retention of longer term contributors and more friends outside the movement is worth the resources being expended. Unfortunately the original dominant altruistic cohort has given way to the whats in it for me cohort, if we are to sustain our future we need to focus on the needs of the cohort we have.

On Sun, 18 Sept 2022 at 17:36, Philip Kopetzky <philip.kopetzky@gmail.com> wrote:
" This project is specifically to develop a leadership development plan that the Community Development team, a team which has some great people on it and a serious possibility for good in supporting volunteers, can use to do their work effectively. " - I'm a bit dismayed that we are using volunteer time in the name of the strategy process to provide a centralised WMF team with the knowledge they need to do their job. This is not what the 2030 strategy is about - it is a  self-centred approach by a WMF team to stay relevant. 

On Sat, 17 Sept 2022 at 19:38, Rae Adimer via Wikimedia-l <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey Andreas,

On the topic of maps vs. territory...it's not beneficial to look at this from the perspective of the WMF being a single unitary entity with a switch that has to pick between planning and doing. This project is specifically to develop a leadership development plan that the Community Development team, a team which has some great people on it and a serious possibility for good in supporting volunteers, can use to do their work effectively. I'd much prefer that their plan be written by a diverse working group of volunteers from across affiliates and administrative roles, than for it to be made internally.

My point in my initial response was that the cost of this investment in process will provide significant benefit to the Community Development team's work over the next best option. Yes, this is not being implemented immediately, but given the fact that the Community Development team is tasked with working towards the "investing in skill and leadership development" Movement Strategy recommendation, and that successful implementation does require planning, this is the best possible way of going about that. If you have specific feedback about how we can improve our efficiency in this or content of the work so far, I (and the LDWG overall) am very much open to discussion, but disagreement over the Movement Strategy recommendation itself is not best in this venue. Personally, given my experiences in functionary roles watching and responding to project takeovers, hostile "leadership", etc. across Wikimedia communities, I am really happy that there is this push to invest in leadership resources for existing and future communities that, if we design it right, can do a lot of good.

As for pre-imposed leadership, that's not what this is about. In your initial comment you mentioned that there were tons of definitions out there for leadership, and in this comment you mention that Wikipedia does not like leadership. That is why we made the definition. Good Wikimedia leadership, to the extent that word is even applicable, is far closer to facilitation, mentorship, and resource-building than any idea of an actual thought leader or designator of tasks. This was not something unanimously agreed on in the working group, but it's something I tried (mostly successfully) to ensure was reflected in the draft definition. I see this not as an attempt to impose top-down leaders, but to guide the creation of resources for future community facilitators, admins, etc. who can promote the organic growth of Wikimedia communities in line with our movement's values.

Best regards,
Rae

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

User:Vermont on Wikimedia projects
they/them/theirs (why pronouns matter)


On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 2:07 PM Andreas Kolbe <jayen466@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Ramzy,

I wanted to acknowledge your eloquent post (for anyone who hasn't read it, please do – DeepL and Google Translation do a really decent job), and in particular your concern about the lack of representation of South East Asian communities in movement governance.

But I would also like to share one thought about the importance of leadership: it's that I think Wikimedians are not particularly keen on having leaders to follow. Projects like Wikipedia, Wiktionary and so on grew precisely because there was no leadership. They provided a space free of pre-imposed leadership. 

This is what attracted people: you could do something, contribute something, without having to ask an authority figure for permission. People were trusted, not led.

This being so, I believe leadership is of limited value in terms of growing participation in line with this volunteer model.

Kind regards,
Andreas

On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 12:27 PM Ramzy Muliawan <muhammadaramzy@gmail.com> wrote:
Pertama-tama saya ingin mengucapkan terima kasih yang setinggi-tingginya kepada Kelompok Kerja Pembinaan Kepemimpinan yang telah menghasilkan definisi ini. Saya pikir ini satu langkah maju yang diperlukan untuk mendorong implementasi rekomendasi Strategi Gerakan mengenai penanaman modal dalam pembinaan keterampilan dan kepemimpinan.

Berkebalikan dengan respon-respon negatif yang diterima oleh prakarsa ini, saya rasa mendefinisikan bentuk kepemimpinan yang diperlukan oleh gerakan Wikimedia secara luas adalah sesuatu yang sudah semestinya kita miliki, sebagai sebuah gerakan antarabangsa yang memiliki jaringan dan struktur tata kelola yang rumit, saling terkait, dan mengandalkan waktu para sukarelawan yang berharga. 

Diskusi mengenai pembinaan kepemimpinan terutama sekali bersifat mendesak untuk wilayah gerakan Wikimedia yang tidak pernah, atau kurang sekali, terwakili dalam tata kelola gerakan secara global. Saya berbicara tentang wilayah asal saya, rantau Asia Tenggara dan Pasifik, yang memiliki tingkat keberagaman proyek Wikimedia yang sangat tinggi, barangkali hanya dapat disaingi oleh beberapa wilayah lain dalam gerakan; organisasi-organisasi mitra lokal yang aktif; dan basis penyunting maupun pasar pembaca yang terus berkembang seiring dengan penetrasi Internet yang semakin mendalam. Meski wilayah ini memiliki status-status sedemikian, Wikimediawan/wati dari rantau Asia Tenggara tidak pernah ada yang berhasil duduk di Dewan Pengawas Yayasan Wikimedia, dan keterwakilan dari rantau ini sangat terbatas pada badan-badan tata kelola gerakan seperti Komite Afiliasi, Komite Bahasa, bahkan badan yang saat ini bertugas untuk merumuskan piagam gerakan. Hal ini tentu saja tidak dapat dijelaskan secara tunggal melalui "kecelakaan sejarah", tetapi akan jauh lebih mudah untuk melihatnya dari lensa kurangnya penanaman modal dan komitmen jangka panjang untuk urusan kepemimpinan ini. 

Kerja-kerja ini tidak akan selesai dalam waktu dekat, dan tidak akan menghasilkan suatu hasil akhir yang dapat memuaskan seluruh pihak yang memiliki kepentingan dalam gerakan Wikimedia. Namun, apa yang dapat kita lakukan tentu saja adalah mencoba terlebih dahulu. Masalah-masalah seperti yang saya sebutkan di atas, dalam konteks rantau asal saya namun juga saya tahu terjadi pada beberapa wilayah lain, tidak akan selesai dengan saling menuding dan mempermasalahkan apakah kerja-kerja ini perlu dilakukan atau tidak. 

Saya mengajak para Wikimediawan/wati yang memiliki perhatian khusus pada hal ini untuk turut serta membantu Kelompok Kerja dalam diskusi yang penting ini. 

On Sat, Sep 17, 2022, 14:29 Peter Southwood <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:

I, too, would appreciate such enlightenment, Cheers, Peter

 

From: Andreas Kolbe [mailto:jayen466@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 September 2022 20:48
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Leadership Development Working Group is ready for community feedback!

 

Dear Ivan,

 

I am very sorry, but I honestly don't understand what any of this is for, and why the WMF is spending money on defining leadership – money collected under the pretence that money is urgently needed to keep Wikipedia online – given that community feedback to this initiative to date seems to be largely negative.

 

 

It is not like the world lacks definitions of leadership. Aren't we spending donors' money to reinvent the wheel here?

 

Could I refer back to an interesting thread Samuel Klein started a while back, titled "Simplifying governance processes"? 

 

 

To me, at least, what Samuel and others said in that thread seemed to be pertinent to initiatives like this one. Samuel started by saying, 

 

"Dear Board (and all), The growing complexity of governance efforts is defeating us. Process creep is an existential threat for projects like ours – it is self-perpetuating if not actively curtailed, as it filters out people who dislike excess process. There's a reason 'bureaucrats' and 'stewards' have unglamorous titles. Global governance in particular seems to be suffering from this now. Let's try to scale it back!"

 

He received no reply from the WMF, at least not here on this list where he posted. 

 

It seems to me we are spending a great deal of money to produce words – but not words in Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikisource etc., that the public enjoys and finds valuable, but words on Meta talking about ourselves in the best navel-gazing tradition.

 

Now, maybe I have this all back to front and am simply clueless ... so if someone feels like enlightening me, please do!

 

Best,

Andreas 

 

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 4:33 PM Ivan Martínez <galaver@gmail.com> wrote:

TL;DR: The draft leadership definition[1] prepared by the Leadership Development Working Group is ready for community feedback! Please share your feedback on Meta[2], the feedback form[3] or the Movement Strategy Forum[4]. You can also directly mail us at  leadershipworkinggroup@wikimedia.org. The feedback will be collected till October 6, 2022.  

 

Hello everyone!

 

I hope you are aware that the Leadership Development Working Group[5] has been working over the past few months to formulate and find ways to nurture the leadership of our movement. The Leadership Development Working Group (LDWG) is a group of Wikimedia volunteers representing different communities, languages, roles, and experiences. We are pleased to inform the community that our draft definition of leadership is now available for community feedback. This first draft definition of leadership was written after months of discussion, learning, and sharing from our community perspective. The Wikimedia Movement, which is by nature diverse and distinctive in its own way, is expressly addressed by this definition.

 

Please consider going through the definition and letting us know what you think by October 6, 2022. The draft definition includes a general definition of leadership and subcategories that elaborate on the actions, qualities, and outcomes of good leadership. 

 

There are many places where you can express your ideas, suggestions, and comments, such as the meta talk page[2], the feedback form[3], and Movement Strategy Forum Post[4]. You can also directly mail us at leadershipworkinggroup@wikimedia.org. 

 

You can check if the general definition, and the subcategories align with your idea of leadership in the movement. You can also try finding the gaps, maybe some qualities of a leader or anything else are missing in the draft definition or you can check if the definition applies to all cultural, linguistic, community or other contexts of the movement and share your thoughts with us.

 

Together, let's celebrate the movement's diverse and distinctive leadership! 

 

Cheers!

 

[1] Link to the draft definition on meta 

[2] Link to meta talk page 

[3] Link to the feedback form

[4] Link to the Movement Strategy Forum post 

[5] Link to the meta page of LDWG

 

--

Iván Martínez
Voluntario - Wikimedia México A.C.
User:ProtoplasmaKid

// Mis comunicaciones respecto a Wikipedia/Wikimedia pueden tener una moratoria en su atención debido a que es un voluntariado.
// Ayuda a proteger a Wikipedia, dona ahora: https://donate.wikimedia.org

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/HBXEEEEPUTHPIJBI5XAPB4ME4EE2O7LA/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org

 

width=

Virus-free.www.avg.com

 

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/XD6EN2N5EIXC22SHB5H3DSFLBBTZE2AY/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/VDQBBQ44DRPQPKS4ECQYNAZUACDKSDTH/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/QLI2KNLEXHORHVN4DGU2RGRNQR6YEGH7/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/L4PH6URBJVZV5PUT22OP5XFGABW4X6KM/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/CWAXASZAFWDUEGPE6XFETDCFK76KUN2T/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org


--
Boodarwun
Gnangarra
'ngany dabakarn koorliny arn boodjera dardoon ngalang Nyungar koortaboodjar'