Okay
This has little to do with a supposed "upper circle".
I guess everyone has a need for a break from time to time.
If I just consider recent times with people around me :
Tim has consider entirely giving up wikipedia for a while, and is hopefully back though with less activity
Elian was on a wikibreak about 3 weeks ago
Sannse is currently on wikibreak though I do not know why. I just heard it was because of my proposal on OTRS. I know nothing more.
Ellisllk has decided to quit wikipedia recently, asking me to unsysop him on wikipedia and wikiquote
Danny is on wikibreak due to me not telling him what he expected, and he made at least 3 or 4 wikibreaks in the past months
Sj has been on and off since december
Yourself, Villy, has been on a big wikibreak in january and part of february (right ?)
Dunno about you, but I do not see a lot of Angela these days. Love is getting her busy.
Aphaia quit participating to some projects
Etc...
And likely, dozen of wikipedians are everyday on a break
We do not always know why they do it.
Some people live wikipedia passionately, others have more of an equal mood. Not everyone is equal in front of stress and disappointment.
Yeah, I thought of explaining more why I am currently tired. But really, this should be obvious by the past days mails here. The rest of it is private issues.
Perhaps I can only add four points.
First, in the past few days, I did not sufficiently listened to others. I should have listened more. Or I should just have keep my mouth shut entirely. So perhaps it is more loss of faith in myself than in the project ?
Second, to listen more to others however, it would be helpful that they talk. When they do not talk, it is really hard to know where to put feet, and it is hard to represent mute people. Typical example would be the proposal for OTRS. I may be the one concerned by the amount of mails to answer, but we might be all concerned by what we want the Foundation to become, a family kinda stuff, or something a bit more organised. If so, I would love to hear opinions on this. Please see the amount of feedback on this. I may have a responsability toward users, but I think that in a similar sort of way, users have a responsability toward me. Either one of support, or one of criticism, or suggesting other ideas... dunno... uh... something... less silent possibly ?
Third, I had some bad proprietary thoughts. I still think that images I uploaded on wikipedia are mine in a sense. I should not. If someone delete them, I should just not mind at all. Many of the texts I added to Wikipedia in three years have disappeared, remix in other people texts. They never asked me if they could remove my inputs. I think it is okay. I should not mind either that my images are deleted from Wikipedia (if I repeat it every morning, I should get convinced perhaps ?)
Fourth, I really physically need a break. Aside from all above considerations. The last week has been very heavy for me at work, very little sleep. No heat at home for 4 days while outside temperature was below -10�C. I slept the whole saturday afternoon, which did not prevent me from falling asleep at 10 pm the same day. As I have already announced to a couple of wikipedians, I am waiting for a third baby, and I feel I need rest badly right now. I am tired. At least, I should focus on what is really important. Perhaps answering the pile of mails left in my mail box. Oh well. Whatever.
---------------------------------
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
>The email problem seems to me like a bad spot showing
>more than you are
>talking about. What about gathering a volunteer staff
>like any non-profit
>organization ? I doubt very much the Red Croos
>association or Amnesty
>International coping the routine chores with 3
persons. >For the rest of it,
>I am of course willing to help on legal matters the
way >you find
>appropriate, your suggestion seems allright to me.
>villy
Thank you for understanding the thought being my idea
Villy.
I had many comments on irc, most positive. Some also
proposed their help by mail.
Initially, I had thought of putting it all on the
current board list. However, Angela noted this
possible requirement issue about privacy, which indeed
seems potentially problematic to me. She is rather
supportive of the two queue idea.
Jimbo is supportive of the idea of delegating, but
think a two board queue is too complicated, so would
rather support keeping it all in one queue, the
current board one. And allowing two people to help for
now.
Note that this would in effect help us with the mails,
but go against the privacy supported by Angela, and
not go in the direction of creation of a volunteer
staff... unless the people allowed on this unique
board list is much bigger than currently suggested.
I agree a two board queue is more complicated, but on
the other hand, it allowed any mail to be at least
once seen by one of us.
As for the requirement of privacy, it could possibly
be left out if we are very very clear to say that
mails will not be "private" (though we would ask
allowed people on otrs to swear discretion I suppose).
In this case, private mails to board would be the
solution.
Currently, nothing seems clearly decided then.
Ant
__________________________________
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
Jimmy (Jimbo) Wales schreef:
> I see three candidates for Steward in this thread so
far:
> Yann, waerth, Danny.
>
> Why don't I just make them all 3 stewards and we are
done with it?
[cut]
>
> Having big public elections for everything is a bad
idea. People will
> not be elected unless they are famous, but the way
to get famous is not
> the same thing as the way to be qualified for a
technical position.
>
> Imagine if we elected our developers for example...
>
> --Jimbo
I vote for this option ;-)
--
[[w:nl:gebruiker:walter]]
Imagine the day we nominate developers...
So, right now, Jimbo, you should nominate
Britty
Waerth
Yann
Aurevilly
Fire
Oscar
It would be fair to wait for possibly 2 weeks so that
the fact non-elections will occur be public and any
intersted person can candidate.
I would love to see more people speaking asian
languages, such as chinese, and more for African
countries (possibly arab).
ant
__________________________________
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
Hi all
In the past months, some editors have expressed the
desire to become stewards. At the same time, some
editors expressed the regret that there is no steward
able to understand japanese or chinese and finally
some editors complained current stewards were
sometimes too slow to answer requests.
For these reasons, a new election to name a couple
more stewards will be held in the near future, as soon
as we agree on the election rules.
The past year activity showed that to be most useful a
steward :
* had to be available
* had to participate to request for permission and
steward log activity
* had to be ready to help in many languages (hence be
involved in the international community) rather than
only in his or her mother language.
Actually, we rather discourage steward activity in
one's own language for any removal of status.
This suggests to me the following rules
* it is useless to keep in steward list an inactive
steward. Activity is show best by activity on "request
for permission" (log is sometimes lost). I hence
suggest that any steward with no edits on RfP and no
mention in the log for 6 months be listed as inactive
and with no activity for a year, be removed.
* a new election will be held in march (or soon)
* candidates should have shown implication in
international matters, so we could possibly require
that the candidate has sysop status on meta.
* Candidates should have at least 80% support (neutral
not counted)
* Anyone can vote provided that the editor has a valid
account on meta with a link to at least one user page
on a project where the editor is a participant
* In case of suspicion of sock puppetry, developers
could be asked to check and sock puppet votes
cancelled.
What do you think ?
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stewards
Ant
__________________________________
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
by the way, sorry for breaking all threads, but my
computer is dead, and I do not receive mails, so I do
as I can on other computers :-) sorry
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Developer_access&oldid=31732
Might be relevant for everyone to consult. This is the
page of previous elections.
------
As one of the people who has requested stewardship, I
want to comment on
some of the proposed rules:
In a message dated 3/5/2005 3:14:08 AM Eastern
Standard Time,
anthere9 at yahoo.com writes:
* it is useless to keep in steward list an inactive
steward. Activity is show best by activity on
"request
for permission" (log is sometimes lost). I hence
suggest that any steward with no edits on RfP and no
mention in the log for 6 months be listed as inactive
and with no activity for a year, be removed.
Fully agree. I do, however, think that there should be
a cap on the number
of stewards.
Ant : yes. Something about 18.
* a new election will be held in march (or soon)
It should be very clear who will be eligible to vote
in this new election.
What are the criteria for voting.
Ant : anyone with an account on a project. We might
wish to add a requirement of an account at least one
month old with 50 edits.
* candidates should have shown implication in
international matters, so we could possibly require
that the candidate has sysop status on meta.
Working on meta does not necessarily indicate
proficiency in international
matters. On the other hand, I do think that there
should be some criteria for
becoming a steward that should be clearly defined.
Ant : yes, but WHICH ones ?
* Candidates should have at least 80% support
(neutral
not counted)
To date, I have organized the board election and the
two arb comm elections
in Wikipedia. To the best of my recollection (and I
can check), no candidate
has ever reached 80 percent of the vote. While I
agree on a high threshhold,
this may not be it.
Ant : I think last elections had precisely this value
as a requirement, 80%. And 8 people made it. I nearly
did not :-) I had opposition... I think it is a
reasonable value. There are some elections you did not
organise Danny ;-)
* Anyone can vote provided that the editor has a
valid
account on meta with a link to at least one user page
on a project where the editor is a participant
Valid account on meta from when? are we suddenly going
to see a rush on meta
accounts?
Ant : a valid account on meta so that this account can
link to another project user page. This is standard on
all meta elections Danny.
* In case of suspicion of sock puppetry, developers
could be asked to check and sock puppet votes
cancelled.
What do you think ?
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stewards
Ant
While the ideas are good in principle, I think that
they have to be thought
out a bit more.
Danny
Ant : This is exactly why I made a proposal and
suggested feedback.
__________________________________
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/