This reorg sounds reasonable to me as Sue has presented it.
Since I've spent a number of hours studying WMF's org chart, financials, and related documents, I'd be bold here and answer some questions that have been asked on this list. Let me make an important disclaimer: I am not a member of WMF's staff or on the board of any WMF organization so these answers are 100% unofficial. (:
The FDC is the Funds Dissemination Committee. You can learn about them at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Funds_Dissemination_Committee
The C-team refers to C-level staff. This is a term borrowed from corporate lingo. "C" refers to "chief" as in "chief executive officer" and "chief financial officer" but usually also means positions such as general counsel and, in WMF's case, Vice President of Engineering. There is an English Wikipedia article about this topic at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-level.
Mathieu asked, "On the other hand, don't you fear a reaction from contributors who could feel wronged when they see some people got money where they get nothing?" There are already contributors who have applied for grants and were denied. What may change are what grants are available, who awards them, and what criteria are used for awarding them.
Regarding the WMF org chart: you can see an approximation of it at https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Staff_and_contractors
Regarding what WMF's strategy is: you can find information about it at https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Movement_Strategic_Plan_Summ…. You can also find annual and monthly documents such as monthly reports and the most recent annual plan at https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home .
Cheers,
Pine
fyi
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: MediaWiki Groups are official: start your own!
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:14:39 -0800
From: Quim Gil <qgil(a)wikimedia.org>
Organization: Wikimedia Foundation
To: Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
MediaWiki Groups are now official - and recognized by the Wikimedia
Affiliations Committee:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Groups/
Who wants to start one?
I just created
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Groups/Proposals/San_Francisco
as a real test of the process and a real example of a local group. Other
local groups are welcome. If you are in San Francisco and you want to be
part of this group add yourself to that page. Any ideas welcome!
Looking at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Events there are some local
groups especially welcomed:
* Amsterdam
* Bangalore
* Berlin
* Brussels
* Buenos Aires
* Chennai
* Cologne
* Hong Kong
* Los Angeles
* Paris
* Pune
* San Diego
* Tel Aviv
* Washington DC
... and wherever you are sitting now. :)
The gates for topical groups are also open. I will start pushing one
about Testing / QA, also to test the process with a real example. More
proposals?
Thank you to all the people that provided feedback about the MediaWiki
Groups proposal and especially to
* Federico Leva (alias Nemo), who was especially helpful with his close
marking and attention to detail -
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Nemo_bis
* Bence Damokos was a perfect Affiliations Committee chair and helped
fine tuning the proposal to make it fit with the Wikimedia User Groups -
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Bdamokos
--
Quim Gil
Technical Contributor Coordinator @ Wikimedia Foundation
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil
Hi Bence,
Arne was not present, and the minutes have been corrected. Thanks for
catching that.
Geoff
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 14:58:32 +0100
> From: Bence Damokos <bdamokos(a)gmail.com>
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Minutes of WMF Board: October 26-27, 2012,
> meeting
> Message-ID:
> <CAFeYUi3_4kzwP9etYSftWbrZcCFM=
> LVC+EaXzTuOfmHKkigyhg(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi Geoff,
>
> Thanks for sharing these minutes (and on a Saturday, at that!)
> This is probably an error in the minutes, but was Arne present at the
> October meeting as a trustee?
>
> Best regards,
> Bence
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Geoff Brigham <gbrigham(a)wikimedia.org
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The minutes of the WMF board meeting of October 26-27, 2012, have been
> > ratified and published here:
> > http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Minutes/2012-10-26 .
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Geoff
> > --
> > Geoff Brigham
> > General Counsel
> > Wikimedia Foundation
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> >
>
>
>
The news from today is that FreeBSD didn't succeed to gather enough
money during their annual fundraising [1][2].
Badass suggestion would be that they should ask now Apple for funds.
But, I'll try to keep chortle for myself and remain serious for the
rest of this email.
First of all, FreeBSD is a part of our broader movement and Wikimedia
Foundation and Wikimedia chapters should find a way how to help them.
I suppose that Mozilla Foundation could be also interested in this
venture. Thus, I'd ask WMF and relevant chapters (those who have
money) to organize themselves, contact Mozilla and see how to help
FreeBSD community. I know that it's not a straight-forward action, but
it's manageable.
If necessary, you can send email to me and I'll connect all interested
Wikimedia [and surrounding] organizations. (And, please, don't ask me
"Why should we help them?".)
Second, and more important for ourselves: this is very strong message
to us. Obviously, that's not because our content isn't licensed under
a copyleft license.
While I could appreciate FreeBSD folk's ethical position that free
content should be free without any limit; while I could tolerate their
flirt with proprietary software vendors; it proved that their strategy
is bad for themselves. In short, they rely on their usefulness without
having any defense.
The question of [the type of] content license was the question of
1990s and early 2000s. Wikipedia solved that issue at the very
beginning of its existence.
But, strategic flaws are not limited on choosing the license. There
are many of them and every new epoch brings their own possibilities to
make them.
I can see that we are in similar position now as FreeBSD was during
the late 1990s. Good news is that it's likely that we have ~15 more
years to change things. Bad news is that we are already at least five
years behind our competition.
And our competition are not various online encyclopedias -- not one as
large and as relevant as Wikipedia. Our competition are top Internet
sites, which are taking away the attention of our users.
Fortunately, no top Internet site has enough of imagination to create
viable collaborative educational project of Wikipedia size. (BTW, they
have courage to do that -- Google Knol was the best try. Fortunately.)
Fortunately, we don't have serious competitor outside of our broader
movement (we don't have it inside, neither, but that wouldn't be so
bad news; actually, bad news is that we don't have internal competitor
yet).
Unfortunately, although existing, our steps toward making Wikimedia
projects more attractive to new generations are so small, that it's
hard to see them.
I am happy to see that we finally got two new projects: Wikidata and
Wikivoyage. That's, for sure, the step in the right direction and the
first fresh blood after six years.
However, our fate won't be much different from FreeBSD's if our main
strategies are to repeat the pattern (Wikivoyage) or to do some really
cool things for very limited population (including myself, of course;
I am really excited with Wikidata).
Our strategy should be contemporary. And, yes, that means social
networking and gaming features. And, no, they don't have to be dumb.
[1] http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/12/09/1726222/freebsd-project-falls-short…
[2] http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/
I wrote a page <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Translate_us>
to offer guidance to translators wishing to translate Wikipedia
articles /from/ English to other languages.
You may wish to have that translated for your own languages; or to
"interwiki" link pages which already exist for that purpose.
The English guidance for people translating from other language
Wikipedias /into/ English is at
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Translation>.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
Hi Jan,
Can you elaborate a bit on what your Mission is, and what WikiSupport is as
compared to WikimediaCZ?
-Liam
On Monday, 10 December 2012, Jan Lochman wrote:
> Dear Wikimedia friends,
>
>
> let me announce the foundation of Wiki Support – Czech Republic based NGO
> focusing the human resources development. Following our mission, we would
> like to run some Wikipedia related projects. The motivation is to do things
> differently using a help of external volunteers. In the upcoming year we
> would like to perform two projects. The first should help Wikimedia
> community and Wikimedia Foundation to set and/or customize the Wikipedia
> environment to retain more newbies. The second will focus on getting more
> content and participants to Wikipedia.
>
> If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact us via info at
> wikisupport.cz or grab user Juandev via IRC channel. More information on
> our Google+[1] and Facebook[2] page.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Jan Lochman
> (user Juandev)
>
>
> Wiki Support
> President
> IRC: Juandev
> E-mail: jan.lochman(a)wikisupport.cz <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'jan.lochman(a)wikisupport.cz');>
>
> [1]
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/115222603542943567426/115222603542943567426/p…
> [2] http://www.facebook.com/pages/Wiki-Support/326520464111180
--
wittylama.com
Peace, love & metadata
Hi all,
The minutes of the WMF board meeting of October 26-27, 2012, have been
ratified and published here:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Minutes/2012-10-26 .
Regards,
Geoff
--
Geoff Brigham
General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
Help
----------
Sent from my Nokia phone
------Original message------
From: <wikimedia-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
To: <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Date: Saturday, December 8, 2012 12:00:41 PM GMT+0000
Subject: Wikimedia-l Digest, Vol 105, Issue 17
Send Wikimedia-l mailing list submissions to
wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
wikimedia-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
wikimedia-l-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Wikimedia-l digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [Wikimedia Announcements] Fwd: Announcement: Wikimedia
Foundation restructure (Global Dev & Engineering) (Florence Devouard)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 10:40:13 +0100
From: Florence Devouard <anthere9(a)yahoo.com>
To: wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Fwd:
Announcement: Wikimedia Foundation restructure (Global Dev &
Engineering)
Message-ID: <k9v1tr$75s$1(a)ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Looks fine by me Sue. I also agree that restructuration is good,if only
to avoid getting stuck in habits :)
@Mathieu
You argued that "if it work's, do not break it".
Indeed, but precisely, the prior very wide focus of the WMF was not
working so well. And some time ago, the board decided that WMF should
change by narrowing its focus. Accordingly, it was mandatory that
changes in the structure be made to fit the new narrowed goals of the
WMF. It would have been very strange to changed goals and not adapt the
structure to fit the goal.
You better read these pages
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sue_Gardner/Narrowing_focushttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC
12/7/12 1:04 AM, Sue Gardner wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> On-passing this FYI --- I hope the formatting doesn't break too much.
> If people want to discuss this, maybe the first person could put it on
> a wiki page (attached to Narrowing Focus, maybe?) so the discussion is
> recorded for other interested parties and can be revisited later,
> rather than just being ephemeral.
>
> Thanks,
> Sue
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Sue Gardner" <sgardner(a)wikimedia.org>
> Date: Dec 5, 2012 7:05 PM
> Subject: Announcement: Wikimedia Foundation restructure (Global Dev &
> Engineering)
> To: "Staff All" <wmfall(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
>
> hey folks,
>
> The purpose of this note is to lay out some changes to the structure
> of the Wikimedia Foundation. Some will take place immediately, and
> others will play out over the next six months. I?m announcing it in a
> single big note rather than bits & pieces because I want everyone to
> have the overview: where we?re headed and why. This will be long ---
> please bear with me.
>
> First, some context. Why are we restructuring? Basically: if an
> organization?s going to function well, it needs to reorg every now and
> then. As an organization grows and changes and learns, its
> organizational structure gradually gets out-of-date --- it needs to be
> refreshed based on our experiences and our ambitions, or else it?ll
> eventually stop working. And structure should follow strategy: as
> strategy evolves, structure needs to evolve as well. With the
> Narrowing Focus emphasis on engineering and grantmaking, we?ve revised
> our strategy, and so we need to refresh our structure too.
>
> So what?s the purpose of this restructure? What are the problems it?s
> aiming to solve, and what coming changes do we want to be ready for?
>
> The whole purpose of this restructure is to support increased emphasis
> on engineering and grantmaking. Some specific issues:
> * The FDC is off to a good start: it?s proved it?s able to make tough
> choices, and its decisions are being respected by the chapters and the
> community. For the FDC to do a really good job for us next year
> though, it's going to need to be able to assess the impact of the
> funding it?s given out --- not just ?is this organization capable of
> spending this much money competently? but ?to what extent is this
> spending helping the movement achieve its goals.? The FDC won't be
> able do that without support from us, and so we need and want to
> invest in support for programmatic evaluation. At this point the
> movement has very little ability to say ?x kind of activity is having
> a good effect? and ?Y kind of activity is not? -- we need to help
> equip it to do that.
> * Currently more than half the organization?s staffing and spending is
> concentrated in engineering. That?s great and it fits with our
> strategy, but it doesn?t necessarily make sense to have half the
> organization reflected at the C-level by a single person. I would like
> the C-team to be less admin-heavy and more weighted towards
> programmatic activities.
> * Currently, as Erik has said in an earlier note, he personally makes
> any trade-offs that need to be made in terms of where to focus
> engineering/product resources. He believes, and so do I, that we could
> get better decision quality if there were more debate at the executive
> level about tradeoffs.
> * After a couple of years of developing the foundations of the
> engineering department, we?re ready now to upwards-prioritize user
> experience, analytics, and high-level strategic planning and
> assessment. We want to add more resources to those areas.
>
> So, what are we going to do?
>
> First, we?re going to revamp Global Development. Starting now, that
> department will be called Grantmaking and Programs. It will be co-led
> by Anasuya (grantmaking) and Frank (programs). Anasuya and Frank will
> have separate direct reports and budgets, but we?re going to keep it
> as a single department because neither sub-department is very large
> and because the two are deeply interlinked: we wouldn?t have one
> without the other. Anasuya, currently Director of Global Learning and
> Grantmaking, will become Senior Director of Grantmaking, and Frank,
> currently Global Education Program Director, will become Senior
> Director of Programs.
>
> Anasuya will be responsible for running all grantmaking processes (for
> both individuals and entities) and for helping movement entities, like
> chapters and thematic organizations, to develop and mature. Reporting
> to Anasuya will be Asaf Bartov, Jessie Wild, Oona Castro and Siko
> Bouterse, as well as a Senior Program Officer for the FDC (a new
> position that will be filled within the next month or so).
> * The Senior Program Officer will be responsible for facilitating the
> FDC process, which recommends funding allocations for the largest and
> wealthiest Wikimedia organizations such as Wikimedia Germany and
> Wikimedia France.
> * Asaf continues to be responsible for the Wikimedia Grants Program,
> supporting younger, smaller Wikimedia organizations like Wikimedia
> Venezuela and Wikimedia Mexico, and for finding non-Wikimedia
> organizations that we can fund to carry out good programmatic
> activities in developing countries, particularly where there are no
> chapters.
> * Jessie will be responsible for evaluation and learning for all our
> grantmaking --- both helping us internally optimize our processes, and
> helping us and the grant recipients assess organizations? development
> (for Anasuya) and the impact of the programs funded by movement
> dollars (for Frank).
> * Oona will continue to run the Brazil program. Consistent with the
> Narrowing Focus plan, she is actively seeking a partner to continue
> the work in Brazil within a grants structure similar to the one we
> recently negotiated with CIS in India.
> * Siko is taking over responsibility from Asaf for all funding for
> individuals. This will make it possible for us to grow our individual
> grant-making, and it will also free up Asaf to do more small
> organization development. Siko will also be responsible for
> documentation and analysis of all grants except the ones funded by the
> FDC. It?s important for us to grow grantmaking to individuals because
> individuals create 99% of the value in the projects. They do it with
> practically no funding, but in some cases a little money will be able
> to make something great happen.
>
> Frank will be responsible for designing and implementing a
> collaborative program evaluation process that will help the movement
> optimize its programs, including, but not limited to, those funded by
> grants. His clients for that will be fund-seeking entities (to help
> them make decisions about what programs to run) and the grantmaking
> groups (to help them make decisions about what requests to fund). He
> will also continue to hold responsibility for the Wikipedia Zero
> project and the Global Education program.
>
> Reporting to Frank will be Kul Wadhwa and a new Senior Program Officer
> for the Global Education team (a new position that will be filled
> within the next few months, and to whom Annie Lin and LiAnna Davis
> will report). Frank will likely also begin to build a small team
> supporting program evaluation: he is starting now to develop a plan
> for that.
> * The Global Education Senior Program Officer will be responsible for
> running the Global Education Program, which supports Wikipedians and
> educational institutions in running programs in which students write
> Wikipedia articles as part of their classwork. This program, which
> started a couple of years ago, has proven effective at improving
> article quality without costing much money. Inside Global Ed, LiAnna
> is responsible for communications (creating and improving materials
> and tools for teachers, students and volunteers), and Annie is
> responsible for expansion to new geographies. LiAnna and Annie?s roles
> won?t change.
> * Kul continues to be responsible for leading the Wikipedia Zero team
> which makes deals with mobile providers giving their users access to
> Wikipedia with no charges for data.
> * Jessie reports to Anasuya, but will also support Frank in his
> program evaluation work. And, Frank?s program evaluation plan may
> result in us creating new positions for evaluation work.
>
> That?s Global Development. Now Engineering.
>
> 62% of the Wikimedia Foundation?s staff (79 of 127 people) are in
> Engineering and given our increasing emphasis on engineering and
> grantmaking we can expect that proportion to grow. That?s a pretty big
> span of control for a single person, and so as you know over the past
> month we?ve been discussing whether to split the department in two:
> one focused on Engineering, and the other Product. After talking it
> through (a lot), we?ve decided not to do that right now: we think it?s
> possible we may be able to achieve our objectives without breaking up
> the department.
>
> So what are going to do?
>
> For the moment, we?re going to keep Engineering as a single
> department, incorporating Platform (Rob Lanphier), Features (Terry
> Chay), Ops (CT Woo), Mobile (Tomasz Finc), Languages (Alolita Sharma)
> and Product (Howie Fung). No change there. We want to
> upwards-prioritize user experience, analytics, and high-level
> strategic planning and assessment. Here?s what will happen next with
> regards to that:
> * Erik and Howie are going to hire a Director of User Experience. The
> position will be posted sometime in the next few weeks, and we hope to
> have the person in place around February/March. Once that happens,
> Brandon Harris, Heather Walls, Munaf Assaf, Pau Giner and Vibha Bamba
> will report to the Director of User Experience.
> * We?re going to have a series of meetings to figure out how best to
> structure analytics work. These meetings will include (in various
> groupings) me, Erik, Rob, Howie and other internal analytics clients
> and stakeholders, and research/analytics staff. To date, the people
> working in research and analytics have been distributed throughout the
> organization on different teams, reporting to different bosses. Right
> now, we are leaning towards combining all those people into a single
> department so that they can concentrate their energies and give the
> organization maximum bang for its buck. That would include: Aaron
> Halfaker, Andrew Otto, Dan Andreescu, Dario Taraborelli, David
> Schoonover, Diederik Van Liere, Evan Rosen, Erik Zachte and Ryan
> Faulkner. At this point, we?re operating on the assumption that we
> will post and board a Director of Analytics (or some similar, possibly
> more expansive title) position, probably late in the first three
> months of 2013.
> * Erik, Gayle and I are going to meet to discuss options for what can
> come off Erik?s plate to free him up to focus more on product,
> strategy, user experience and analytics and evaluation. In January,
> we?ll meet with the Engineering directors to make a final decision
> about whether to split the department or add more resources to
> Engineering in some other fashion.
>
> Geoff and I are also pleased to announce a change in title for Jay
> Walsh. Effective immediately, Jay?s title will change from Head of
> Communications to Senior Director, Communications, owing to the
> expanded duties and scope of the Foundation's communications team.
> Since he started, Jay has grown the team from one to four people (Jay,
> James Alexander, Matthew Roth and Tilman Bayer), and it now has a
> wider range of responsibilities, including creative direction,
> editorial/news production, research, and merchandise. And so, we're
> pleased to recognize the considerable work of Jay and the team. (This
> really isn?t a restructure-related announcement, but I?m putting it in
> this note so all the news comes at once :-))
>
> That?s the roadmap for where we?re headed right now. To summarize:
> Global Dev?s name is changing to Grantmaking and Programs, and it will
> be co-led by Anasuya (Grantmaking) and Programs (Frank). Some people?s
> job functions and reporting lines will change. In Engineering, we are
> adding two new positions: a Director of User Experience (search will
> launch in January), and a Director of Analytics (or some similar
> title) (search will launch by March). We will also be discussing in
> January whether to break Engineering into two departments, Engineering
> and Product & Strategy, or not.
>
> Last thing I want to say: We?ve been talking about this restructure
> for a month or so --- it?s used up a fair bit of organizational energy
> and caused some noise and anxiety. So I was interested to read the
> other day a new blog post by Clay Shirky, in which he said this: ?Open
> systems are open. For people used to dealing with institutions that go
> out of their way to hide their flaws, this makes these systems look
> terrible at first. But anyone who has watched a piece of open source
> software improve, or remembers the Britannica people throwing tantrums
> about Wikipedia, has seen how blistering public criticism makes open
> systems better.?
>
> I am not actually asking for your blistering public criticism :-) But
> I am asking you to accept that things are going to be a little messy
> for a while, and to continue to engage in good faith as we work
> through this stuff. This stuff can be raw because of the implications
> for people personally: I?m grateful that for the most part people seem
> to have been able to set aside their individual self-interest and
> think about what?s good for the organization overall --- I?d ask you
> to keep trying to do that.
>
> If you?ve got questions about this, you can ask them here on the list,
> or at the metrics meeting tomorrow morning, or speak with your boss or
> me.
>
> Thanks,
> Sue
>
>
>
> --
> Sue Gardner
> Executive Director
> Wikimedia Foundation
>
> 415 839 6885 office
> 415 816 9967 cell
>
> Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
> the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
>
> https://donate.wikimedia.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please note: all replies sent to this mailing list will be immediately directed to Wikimedia-l, the public mailing list of the Wikimedia community. For more information about Wikimedia-l:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> _______________________________________________
> WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list
> WikimediaAnnounce-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
End of Wikimedia-l Digest, Vol 105, Issue 17
********************************************