[I always thought we had a numerical limit on cross-posting emails...]
Anyway, Kliouk, I gess we cannot really answer your content question
on any of these lists, try
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference desk
Yours,
Michael
2008/1/27 <klassikpiano(a)web.de>:
> Dear Administrators from Wikipedia,
> I am russian and studying Musik in Russia and now in Hamburg/ Germany. Give me please Information about
>
> Zeilenwechsel . http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versetzungszeichen
>
> Gilt es beim Übergang in die andere Hand am Klavier?
>
> Ich habe die Beispiele von J.S.Bach und D. Schostakowitsch.
>
>
> I have Notes examples from J.S.Bach, D. Schostakowitsch and modern Composers for your articles http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versetzungszeichen
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> z.H. Herrn
> Kliouk Guerman
> Grandweg 170,
> Germany-22529 Hamburg
>
> Tel: ++4940 56060770
> klassikpiano(a)web.de
> 017621251917(a)o2online.de
>
>
> Warnakzidenzien [Bearbeiten]
> Aus Gründen der Klarheit werden gelegentlich eigentlich überflüssige Versetzungszeichen dennoch als Warnakzidenzien gesetzt, beispielsweise in folgenden Fällen:
> wenn im Takt vorher eine andere Versetzung galt
> wenn in einer anderen Stimme gleichzeitig oder kurz vorher eine andere Versetzung gilt (z. B. bei einem Querstand)
> wenn übergebundene Noten, die die Alteration beibehalten, durch einen
> Zeilenwechsel
> getrennt werden, so wird das Versetzungszeichen am Beginn der neuen Zeile wiederholt
> Warnakzidenzien werden gelegentlich dadurch als solche kenntlich gemacht, dass man sie einklammert, kleiner druckt oder oberhalb der betreffenden Note setzt.
>
>
>
> Attachment in Programm - Open Office..odt ,
> Word.doc
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versetzungszeichen
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
Hoi,
It is with pleasure that the Language committee announces that we have
permission from the board to ask for the start of the Hungarian Wikinews..
The request can be found under
http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12865
We wish the Hungarian Wikinews great stories, but first and foremost a lot
of fun in making their project a success.
Thanks,
GerardM
http://pl.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews:Wikinews_Press_Photo
There are still a couple of days left for voting in the Polish Wikinews'
Picture of the Year competition's first round. English
instructions/introduction have been added to the page and if you're really
stuck I'm sure people will help you out.
Perhaps next year Wikinews can be a little more organised and do 3 rounds
with the first being to select photos from the different language projects
to bring forward to a cross-wiki competition, but for this year it's one per
wiki.
Wikinews has seen a great increase in interlanguage cooperation over the
last year, and voting in this competition is a way to help encourage this.
The only people who may spot this cooperation are folks like me who spot the
interwiki being added in Recent Changes. However, it is where the project
could develop a real strength. News - on any subject - in your language.
Brian McNeil
On 1/31/08, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> You do realise the head of the translator committee is banned from
> ja:wp due to personal disagreements? Communities have attacks of
> batshit insane, and that's too much power to hand to one project.
Yes, and did you read my email a little bit more careful? :)
Andres:
- en.wp lifted ban under pressure of its own community.
- If they didn't do that, they would have to do that after implementing SUL.
- If they knew that their decision would affect all other wikis, they
wouldn't be so crazy to do that.
About en-wpization of the community: This is just an unreasonable
fear. Some of very important en-Wikipedians didn't pass even voting
for adminship on Meta. Policy like this would initiate much more
participation of member of a lot of different Wikimedian projects into
Meta issues.
On 1/31/08, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
> A logical extension of Milos' proposal could arise if someone
> persistently insisted on pushing a Serbian POV on hr:wp. The Croatians
> would become very annoyed with this until that individual met one of the
> criteria which Milos suggests. They would block him, and the logical
> consequence would then be that he should also be blocked on sr:wp.
> Somehow, I don't see that this would necessarily be an acceptable result.
sr/hr is not the main issue (usually, the same vandals and trolls are
blocked on both Wikipedias); the main issue are POV pushers on en.wp
who are spreading their own POV on their own, smaller projects; and,
consequently, building heavy POV community; as well as unacceptable
behaviors of some other communities -- which are completely out of the
scope of WM goals.
Lodewijk: All great ideas were unacceptable at the beginning :)))
In a message dated 1/31/2008 9:24:27 PM Eastern Standard Time,
Anthere9(a)yahoo.com writes:
Does that answer your questions ?
Ant
Very well
D
**************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
Florence,
This is a very commendable email, and I admire its simplicity. The values
you suggest are instinctive to anyone who has been involved in the projects for
a while, but as Wikimedia grows, it is important to reiterate them again and
again for new staff and new project members, who have not been raised on
them.
That said, I do have a couple of questions and hope that you can clarify.
In a message dated 1/29/2008 5:06:37 PM Eastern Standard Time,
anthere(a)anthere.org writes:
Our community is our biggest asset
We are a community-based organization. We must operate with a mix of
staff members, and of volunteers, working together to achieve our mission.
We support community-led collaborative projects, and must respect the
work and the ideas of our community. We must listen and take into
account our communities in any decisions taken to achieve our mission.
Question: "Community" has always been a mantra of our projects. As such, I
was a bit surprised by an email exchange with Jay Walsh last week, in which he
said: "I'm hesitant to use the word 'community' as much as I'm hesitant to
call people 'audience.' In reaching out to communicate, so far at least, I'm
more inclined to speak of users, editors, stakeholders, casual readers etc -
but this is my personal interpretation." I found his comment counter-intuitive,
given the nature of the projects to date, and wonder if you might clarify
your opinion on "community" and the terms used to describe it.
of service is a priority
We will try our best to give access to high quality Wikimedia project
content 24 hours a day and 7 days, as well as provide access to
regularly updated, user-friendly, and free dumps of Wikimedia project
content.
To insure world-wide, unrestricted, dissemination of knowledge, we do
not enter into exclusive partnerships, with regards to access to our
content or use of our trademarks.
Freedom
We make extra efforts to use only free software on our own servers, and
to support open and patent-free media formats that are viewable and
editable with free software.
Question: This was the subject of some debate last week, also on this
mailing list. Are we committed "exclusively" to open and patent-free media formats
that are viewable and editable with free software?
Transparency
We must communicate Wikimedia Foundation information in a transparent,
thorough and timely manner, to our communities and more generally, to
the public.
Independance
As a non-profit, we mostly depend on gifts to operate (donations,
grants, sponsorship etc...). It is very important to us to ensure our
organization stays free of influence in the way it operates. For this
reason, we strictly follow a donation policy, reserve the right to
refuse donations from a limited number of sources, and try to multiply
the number of sources.
Question: As a charitable organization, it is easy to become dependent on
the largesse of major donors, who could hold considerable sway over day-to-day
operations. The answer is either to find an independent revenue stream or to
create an endowment to ensure that basic costs are covered in perpetuity.
Frankly, I am biased. I believe that "Independence" is the most important of
these values--without it we will not be able to withstand challenges to all the
other values. As such, what steps are being taken to ensure the Foundation's
financial independence?
I believe in the values as you expressed them, and I am confident that the
Board will vote unanimously in support of them. I am just curious about some of
the practical implications, and eager to hear your thoughts on them.
Danny
**************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489