Absolutely, Pratik.  My point is that the most critical aspect of an initiative such as this should be to get as many community members involved as possible.  Once this happens, and unfortunately only when it happens, will it gather momentum and be sustainable - and then sub-groups of editors will then drift onto other things (more COTMs or different collaborative initiatives entirely.)  ...which is exactly the way it should be.  The essential thing is to keep the number of folks involved growing. As this happens, the community will do what the community does best : improve articles!  ...so not contradicting you; just making a point of emphasis about this effort - especially at the current stage of its lifecylce.  Keep up the fantastic work, buddy.  Awesome to see you going!