While restarting COTM last month, we had reduced our COTM targets from 
five to two and we saw that of these one did well - the other flagged. 
Perhaps it means that the number of people interested in COTM are not 
that many. User:AroundTheGlobe had suggested last month that we consider
 developing the low-hanging fruit ie former GA and FA articles and 
bringing them back to quality each month. Personally I like this idea 
for many reasons:<br>
* it gives a different activity for people to do than just improving an article.<br>
* brining an article to GA is like a quest or challenge for those who prefer such.<br>
* the articles have already reached very good quality and relatively 
little work is required to improve them and restore them to former 
status.<br>
* the WikiProject benefits much more tangibly.<br>
* editors get to learn the GA process (lets begin with GA first) which they can then use to improve their own articles. <br>
<br>
So I propose that for January, we choose one normal article as normal 
COTM and the other as Good Article Collaboration of the Month.<br>
<br clear="all">Warm regards,<br><br>Ashwin Baindur<br>------------------------------------------------------<br>