explain. how social relevance of sanskrit is out of scope of wiki in sanskrit and govt funding to it?  do you guys discuss social relavance of what you are doing at all? if yes, where? if no, that is a grave ommission.

Basavaraj N Itnal

--- On Sat, 2/26/11, Arun Ramarathnam <arunram25@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Arun Ramarathnam <arunram25@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-in-blr] [Wikimediaindia-l] ToI front page: Rs 1 cr for Sanskrit WP
To: "Mailing list for Wikimedians / Wikipedians in & from Bangalore, India" <wikimedia-in-blr@lists.wikimedia.org>, "Basavaraj Itnal" <basavarajitnal@yahoo.com>
Date: Saturday, February 26, 2011, 12:47 PM

Basavaraj,

The social relevance of Sanskrit in India, is not a topic that is in the scope if this list.
It is a much larger topic.

As far as your observations on factual inaccuracies of some articles, that is certainly something you can take up on the talk page of the respective wiki page. There may be more knowledgeable contributors on the subject who can comment on it.  

Could you also please refer the following links or pages that may assist you further:

Thank you
Arun


On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Basavaraj Itnal <basavarajitnal@yahoo.com> wrote:
this is about social relevance of sanskrit to India. and some concomitant errenous insertions.

Basavaraj N Itnal

--- On Sat, 2/26/11, Prateek Ramachandra <prateek.vr@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Prateek Ramachandra <prateek.vr@gmail.com>

Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-in-blr] [Wikimediaindia-l] ToI front page: Rs 1 cr for Sanskrit WP
To: "Mailing list for Wikimedians / Wikipedians in & from Bangalore, India" <wikimedia-in-blr@lists.wikimedia.org>
Cc: "Basavaraj Itnal" <basavarajitnal@yahoo.com>
Date: Saturday, February 26, 2011, 12:00 PM


Guys... what are we discussing here??? Please stop discussing about non-relevant topics... focus on sanskrit wiki... please start another discussion if anyone has anything else to say... 

I


On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Basavaraj Itnal <basavarajitnal@yahoo.com> wrote:
correct version of lingayatism as opposed to brahmanicised version on wiki..


http://www.everyculture.com/South-Asia/Lingayat-Religion-and-Expressive-Culture.html

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hubli/Lingayat-is-an-independent-religion-Mate-Mahadevi/articleshow/7231849.cms

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/134566/veerashaivas-urged-register-lingayats.html


Basavaraj N Itnal


--- On Sat, 2/26/11, Gautam John <gautam@prathambooks.org> wrote:

> From: Gautam John <gautam@prathambooks.org>
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-in-blr] [Wikimediaindia-l] ToI front page: Rs 1 cr for Sanskrit WP
> To: "Mailing list for Wikimedians / Wikipedians in & from Bangalore, India" <wikimedia-in-blr@lists.wikimedia.org>
> Date: Saturday, February 26, 2011, 11:30 AM
> On 26 February 2011 16:57, Basavaraj
> Itnal <basavarajitnal@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > wiki has to recognise and be sensitive to these
> concerns.
>
> It is, in it's content drawing on it's policies of being
> an
> encyclopedia and being neutral. These are very powerful
> pillars that
> promote neutrality of points of view.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best,
>
> Gautam
> ________
> http://social.prathambooks.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-in-blr mailing list
> Wikimedia-in-blr@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-blr
>




_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-blr mailing list
Wikimedia-in-blr@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-blr



_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-blr mailing list
Wikimedia-in-blr@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-blr